Definition of Entrepreneurship by Different Scholars
The study of the aforesaid
definitions makes it clear that different Scholars or authors and economists
have tried to explain the entrepreneurship in the different and broad sense in
their own ways.
Definition
of Entrepreneurship by Different Scholars
These views may be classified as
follows:
1.
Entrepreneurship as risk-taking
capacity.
2.
Entrepreneurship as an organization
building ability.
3.
Entrepreneurship as group level
reactiveness.
4.
Entrepreneurship as functions of
organizations and coordination.
5.
Entrepreneurship as managerial
skills.
6.
Entrepreneurship as the capacity for
high achievements.
7.
Entrepreneurship as innovative
functions and innovative ability, and
8.
Entrepreneurship as leadership
functions.
The aforesaid views are explained as
follows:
ENTREPRENEURSHIP A RISK BEARING
CAPACITY
Scholars like Richard Kentilam, Knight, Musselman and Jackson, Gaikwad and Spenek,
etc. have regarded risk-bearing capacity as an important function of
entrepreneurship. According to them, entrepreneurship is:
·
Investment of time, money and
efforts for starting and making any venture successful and taking risk
in entrepreneurship.
·
The person purchasing and selling
products at an uncertain price is an entrepreneur.
·
The group of specific persons, who
were the uncertainties is entrepreneurs.
·
The ability to take risks and the
power to provide the guarantee against the desire and uncertainties is entrepreneurship.
·
This is the institution of desire to
take risks to face the uncertainties.
·
The capacity to bear risks for any
enterprise, ability to organize, carrying out diversifications and the desire
for making innovations, is entrepreneurship.
Hence, this view is related to the
capacity to bear risks and promotion of the business.
But, the ancient Scholars had not accepted entrepreneurship as
an important component of the economic society and they had also not made a
clear difference
between entrepreneurship and management.
Besides, these views are related to
the underdeveloped economy.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AN ORGANISATION BUILDING ABILITY
VIEWS
Regarding organization building in the
context of entrepreneurship are of Frederick Harbison, Higgins, Frantz, Richman,
and Copen, etc.
They have regarded the following basis
for their views:
1.
Entrepreneurship is the quality of
developing the resources for the enterprise, developing human capabilities and
the leadership ability to coordinate new ideas.
2.
Leadership and
ability to develop creativity are more important for
entrepreneurship, because such ideas may be put to more uses. Hence,
an entrepreneur should not be only an innovator, he should also be a good
leader and an efficient administrator.
3.
The entrepreneurs perform various
organizational and managerial
functions, like searching for production opportunities, arranging
raw materials and their new sources.
4.
Entrepreneurship is the ability of
organization and planning of
various sources of production, in the form of a production unit.
5.
Entrepreneurship indicates some
creative, as well as external and open systems. It performs the functions of
innovations, reducing risk burdens, and providing dynamic
leadership.
Thus, it is not essential that an entrepreneur should be an
innovator, rather he should be a good leader and an efficient administrator.
He may build organizations with his
leadership qualities, administrative skills, and creativity.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP A GROUP-LEVEL REACTIVENESS
F.W. Young, Copen, and Kaul, etc. are the
major components of this view. In this regard, their views are as follows:
·
Entrepreneurship is not
individualistic, but reactiveness emerging at the group level.
·
It is caused by reactive groups in
society.
·
Changes in social and cultural
values cause thoughts at the collective level and by reactive groups.
·
It indicates some creative, external
and open systems.
·
Entrepreneurship is the objective
activity of an individual or group of individuals. It includes an integrated
range of decisions.
·
Reactiveness expressed by minority
consumers, Women, Social reformists, and environmentalists, in view of social
transformation, reveals diversification.
Thus, Entrepreneurship is not an
individual quality, but if the reactive capacity expressed for social
uniformity.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP A FUNCTION OF
ORGANISATION AND COORDINATION
Noted economists J.B. Say and Alfred
Marshal have Expressed their views, by regarding organization and
coordination of various sources of production as an important function of
entrepreneurship.
Besides, these two economists, Kilwad,
Frantz, and Lindsay are also those Scholars, who are of the view that:
1.
Entrepreneurship is a combination of
various activities, which includes combining resources of production,
management adapting of techniques and commodity, etc.
2.
Entrepreneurship is an organization
and combination of various resources of production, in the form of the
production unit.
3.
It is a function of estimating
future requirements of the society and to fulfill successfully these
requirements by a new, creative and imaginative combination of the resources.
4.
The entrepreneur is an economic
factor which produces socially useful commodities by organizing and
coordinating various sources of production, like land, labour, and capital in
proper operation.
5.
There are many criteria of the difference
between an entrepreneur and a capitalist.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS MANAGERIAL
SKILLS
Scholars, like B.F. Haslez,
and J.S. Mill and Marshal,
etc. have viewed entrepreneurship in terms of managerial
skills.
They have following views to express
entrepreneurship.
1.
Financial ability is not the man’s
ability as an entrepreneur.
2.
Managerial skill is an important
aspect of entrepreneurship.
3.
Inspection, control,
and direction are the important
functions of entrepreneurship.
4.
Entrepreneurship also includes the
ability to direct, along with the capacity of bearing risks in the business.
5.
Entrepreneurship includes bearing
risks in the business, arranging labour and capital, formulating general
plans, establishing
new Enterprises,
investing various resources, selecting high-quality managers for the day to day
operation of the business and ability to take various decisions for the
efficient and gainfull operation of the business and keeping supervision on
various business-related activities.
6.
According to Marshall, “An
entrepreneur plays the role of a manager, after the establishment of the
enterprise.”
Thus, entrepreneurship is Managerial
skills, which facilitates easy achievements of the determined
objectives of the Institution.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP A CAPACITY OF HIGH
ACHIEVEMENTS
According to Macleod,
obtaining high achievements in entrepreneurship.
However, for that the capacity to bear risks and taking decisions
for innovations is essential.
He has accepted entrepreneurship as
a physiological motivation also, which exists in all individuals.
Besides, H.N. Pathak has
said that entrepreneurship includes those broad areas, for which various
decisions are to be taken.
These decisions may be broadly divided
into three categories, 1. knowing the opportunities, 2. organizing industrial
units and 3. operating the industrial unit as a profitable dynamic and
progressive Institution.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS INNOVATING
FUNCTIONS AND INNOVATIVE
Ability: according to Schumpeter,
“Entrepreneurship works for making any new invention and implementing it,
improving the method of
production or bringing revolution in that.”
For the first time, Schumpeter defined
entrepreneurship as Innovative ability.
He was of the view that production
of any new product, use of any new method of
production, development of New Market,
the search of new sources of raw materials and semi-finished products, the
operation of new Organisation in any industrial, all such activities are
included in entrepreneurship.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS LEADERSHIP
FUNCTIONS
Entrepreneurship is a leadership function.
Such views have been expressed by Scholars, like Harbinson and Schumpeter.
They are of the
opinion that for entrepreneurship, leadership and creativity is more important,
since new ideas may be put to economic uses.
Hence, it is not essential that an entrepreneur has
to be an innovator. He should be rather a good leader and an efficient
administrator.
He may build the organization only
by leadership, administrative abilities, and creativity.
Hence, the definitions given by Schumpeter present
a completely new perspective, as the pace of development depends only upon
various new changes, improvements and their application in the business.
Read more:
Comments
Post a Comment